The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has a 6.67-inch QHD+ Fluid AMOLED display, the 'Fluid' meaning that it has a 90Hz refresh rate. There's also no wireless charging, which is a real shame for a flagship phone in 2019.įinally, on the top of the device, you'll find the pop-up front-facing camera. Unffortunately, it doesn't support USB Power Delivery, meaning that a different 30W charger won't get you the same charging speed. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren supports Warp Charge 30T 30W charging, which is even faster than Warp Charge 30. On the bottom, there's a USB Type-C port for charging and a speaker grille, along with the nano-SIM slot. The left side off the device is where you'll find the volume rocker. To my knowledge, Apple is the only other OEM that includes such a switch, and I think it's a super-useful feature. There are three settings on the switch, one to keep your ringer on, one to silence your phone, and one to put it on vibrate. On the right side of the device, there's a power button and a switch for silencing notifications. Perhaps now that OnePlus is doing two phones at a time, it's planning to redesign the Pro in the spring and the non-Pro in the autumn. The non-Pro model is the one that has a significant design change. That's no surprise though, since the T-series is something of an iteration on the main one. The color looks fantastic.Īside from the McLaren design, this device looks almost identical to the OnePlus 7 Pro from earlier this year. With the 7T Pro 5G McLaren, it's all about Papaya Orange, and it's a nice change of pace. Most of the company's devices come with red power cables, in red boxes, and so on. OnePlus has typically used the color red for themes. The orange highlights around the bottom part of the frame and around the camera module are a theme for this device, and that feels new for OnePlus. There's a design around the OnePlus camera module and the OnePlus logo though, and there are orange accents. Mostly, the back of the handset is black. The device is a glass sandwich with a metal frame, like many phones, but there's a lot more to it. While it's a mouthful to say, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is one of the most beautiful and unique devices on the market. What's cool is that it isn't the typical cheap plastic case that phones come with. In either case, these results paint a competitive picture for the desktop PC space soon, one in which price (and supply in light of the shortages) will be exceedingly important.One other item I found hidden in the box was a case. We expect more mature BIOS revisions will be headed out before launch. This is but one benchmark, though, and several factors could influence the score, including early firmware with the Core i9-11900K. Strangely though, the 5800X pulls ahead of the 11900K in the multi-core department by 17%, which is a larger delta than we expected because these are both eight-core chips. Here the 11900K pulls ahead of the 5800X by a mere 4.4%. Increased IPC truly floats all boats.īut against the 5800X, the single-core results are much closer, naturally, with Zen 3's much higher IPC performance. That's actually pretty impressive, though: The ten-core Core i9-10900K has two more cores than the eight-core Core i9-11900K, so we expected a much larger advantage in favor of the chip with two extra cores. However, looking at the multi-core results, the inverse happens and the 10900K is 6.5% faster due to its higher core count. The Core i9-11900K was ~15% faster than its predecessor, the 10900K, in the single-core tests. Intel claims a 19% increase in IPC for the Rocket Lake chips, and that appears to be roughly accurate in this test. The big takeaway here - don't look too deeply into the overall Geekbench 5 test results. In fact, Geekbench's developer has stated that the AVX-512 testing disparity will be addressed in the Geekbench 6 benchmark that's due out later this year. Geekbench 4 isn't perfect either, but its lack of AVX-512 support makes the test much more accurate when gauging per-core performance without using an exotic SIMD instruction (AVX-512) that has no meaningful uptake in mainstream desktop PC software. This can lead to an inaccurate picture that makes Rocket Lake appear better in relation to AMD's competing chips, not to mention Intel's previous-gen models. In turn, this inflates Rocket Lake's overall Geekbench 5 scores against all other processors that don't support AVX-512. We've encountered strange phenomenons with Geekbench 5, where its use of AVX-512 can widely skew the results in the encryption subtest. In a nutshell, you shouldn't trust Geekbench 5's overall scores as an accurate measure of Rocket Lake's performance, and there's a technical reason why.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |